Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
Paul_Y2J said: 1. Actually, I had to look in 0.2 to find that, in normal speed is not a problem, or course.
2. But, the old post had comments about that, that's why I'm asking...my point is that how is it ''jarringly'' if the last frame is almost fading out like is it supposed to do, like you're saying...then, the correction would be like showing one more frame of the remaining of his right arm?
Thanks for moving it here, I think that that scene would need a few more frames to convey the solider falling over if that was in intent. As it stands I don't think it was... normal speed and 0.2 speed yield the same result here in my mind, the soilder just disappears rather than naturally falling out of frame. Seems to be the common sentiment. I deleted the comments under the og post because they were becoming a clutter and we got a very interesting "it works well with sound so why are you complaining" comment on a site that posts clips devoid of sound.
KamKKF