This post belongs to a parent post.

Edit | Respond

Might not get a response but, how do you tell apart his layouts(on paper) to his gengas? His layouts look clean enough to pass as genga
CBA said:
Might not get a response but, how do you tell apart his layouts(on paper) to his gengas? His layouts look clean enough to pass as genga
His LO is remarkably clean but the lines still arent clean enough to pass for genga. The lack of shadows/highlights and intricate details also

Generally genga doesnt have backgrounds either but its always possible to composite it in so that can sometimes be misleading
Thanks for the response :D

Yeah that's how I usually see it, but this is comparable to his rock lee 'gengas', which also had some loose lines, the scan quality doesn't help either. So I wondered, are there factors that go beyond just the drawings (timing etc.)?

Or were the tags labelled incorrectly
CBA said:
Might not get a response but, how do you tell apart his layouts(on paper) to his gengas?
Also, most of the time, genga is actually drawn on clean papers (so no frame borders, cut numbers etc). A lot of the time, genga will be posted with BG LO also applied though, so the genga can "seem" to be drawn on LO paper. In this cut however, you also clearly see the LO paper the 1gen is drawn on.
Habarudo said:
Also, most of the time, genga is actually drawn on clean papers (so no frame borders, cut numbers etc). A lot of the time, genga will be posted with BG LO also applied though, so the genga can "seem" to be drawn on LO paper. In this cut however, you also clearly see the LO paper the 1gen is drawn on.
GOTCHA, thanks man